England Have My Bones
“God keep my soul and England have my bones.”—T. H. White, after Shakespeare
I suppose we all have an idea of what constitutes real living. It’s not all those compromises we endure while we bridge the gap between yesterday and tomorrow. Real living is when we can say “this is it!” asking nothing from tomorrow at all. By this criterion, my real life has lately begun.
The evening sun was calling me, so I went to Saunderton Lee. It’s a place K & I have got to know well over the last nine years without ever thinking of it as a place, having approached it in different seasons from different directions, and counted them simply as walks, among all the others. I went alone this time but she was with me in my mind. When you share a closeness over the years, you find yourself each bound to the other, able to share everything. And when you recall a shared moment, for example by passing through the same spot, it brings a lively sense of that person’s presence. And if you’re separated for any length of time you feel a pang of absence, which, when absorbed in busyness, you don’t notice consciously. Then it comes back strongly when you are carefree and fully attentive to the present. In such a state, I see that the days of our life are a pattern of union and separation, like the play of sunshine and cloud on these fields and copses, altering our moods accordingly.
It’s a network of footpaths between and through fields. After the recent harvest they’ve been left as stubble or ploughed. In any landscape there may be some routes we’ve actually trodden, and others we’ve traversed simply with yearning eyes—something I did for years when I could only walk for yards at a time. One such route runs southwards through this narrow plain till it disappears in a fold in the landscape and thence beyond the horizon. Many times I have looked in wonder, imagining that “beyond” as a cherished destination of our prehistoric ancestors, or a storybook picture from my childhood reading. In fact we’ve probably trodden those paths, coming here from the opposite direction. And if you follow that fabled route to beyond, through the fold and over the horizon, you reach our house in town, five miles away.
While I scanned these fields, the sun was planning its descent below the Bledlow Ridge skyline, but there was still time to follow one or two trails, and reach those wooded slopes still gilded with light. Each clod on the ploughed field stood proud with its own shadow. My own was fifteen foot long.
Despite a few modern houses scattered around, this place has a majesty and solitude, but you wouldn’t come here for any particular views, wildlife or scenic grandeur. Have no expectations, no thoughts of elsewhere. Then you may see Eden, freshly restored to its state before the Fall.
Many are those, and I am one, for whom heaven is to be on foot in a landscape. And when it’s not quite heaven, it still offers a meditation, one which bears fruit immediately. The best landscape to be in is one showing 360 degrees of skyline, encircling you in its embrace. No photo or painting can show how it responds to the observer; it swivels and transforms as you follow your route. Hidden parts are revealed, prominent features hide. The church spire to the left of the barleyfield is now on the right. Every horizon hides a further landscape beyond, but offers it up to the will of your trudging feet. No map can tell us what any of this looks like; for it has no definite existence or duration. I have a sense of owning this landscape, or of its owning me. An enchantment is involved. It’s not diminished by knowledge that the rules of perspective are mathematical. They can be aped in “virtual reality”, which does not resemble being here, in this scene. For I am literally part of the landscape, part of England, part of the All. Perhaps I could survive here for a day or two, on these hedgerow blackberries, sloes, haws and apples. My riches could be the silver brooches of these dried thistle-heads shining in the late sun. I could be a clown’s comedy version of King Lear, not banished and lost but found, not blind like Gloucester but seeing as never before.
As I pass under the powerlines and round a pylon, I feel this is my home, if it will have me. Let England have my bones! I don’t give a damn where they put my remains when I’m gone—who does?—but still, I suggest they may scatter my ashes in this landscape, perhaps under this very pylon, where the public footpath goes over a little stile. Then they could come, park nearby, and walk across the fields, no matter the weather on that day. And then, who knows, they might share this feeling that I don’t know how to convey. If it’s a nice summer day, they could bring a picnic.
Now I’m at the spot where I did my first pastel, nine years ago. We were sitting together under this tree, and I drew— or is it painted?—from life. I proudly published it with these words alongside:
I’m just learning how to use these chalks (oil pastels), but was quite pleased at the result. We sat on a rug with a hedge behind us, and I peered over the ripening wheat field (in case you can’t recognise it) to view this scene.They were very cheap pastels and I didn’t have a proper range of colours, and the intense effort of painting in this new medium was quite exhausting. The very next day my camera expired and it seemed as if the Japanese technology inside committed hara-kiri from shame at its inferiority. So I thought from now on I must master this new medium, take infinite pains teaching myself (like my namesake Vincent) to capture the dark mystery of those trees on the skyline, the colours, textures and above all the emotional truth, just as it struck my heart, of what I see, instead of this instant clicking. But my new mania didn’t last long and these days I just take snaps, as with this one, which shows how the same scene looks today. The copper beech in front of Chiltern Cottage has grown bigger.
I don’t imagine these farmers arranging bales of straw on trailers will see these fields as I do—a creation brimming with love—but there’s no way to be sure.
At some point in my walk I recalled a woman in the market earlier that day, asking me if I wanted to be saved by Jesus. There’s an organized group. They give food and clothes to the needy, preach, sing “Bless the Lord, O my Soul” with guitar accompaniment. I’ve found a picture of her at the same spot, near their regular stall. She puts out chastely for Jesus. A certain type of Christian is so moved by the sacrifice of the Cross as to imitate in their own lives and I think it may impart a kind of erotic thrill, to be moved by the Spirit and move others. Thus they become in their own eyes beautiful, which makes them indeed beautiful. Up to this point, I see no losers. But then comes the decline and the exploitation, endemic in sects or regions; which gets worse when it feels threatened. Such is our humanity.
Time and again I’ve stood up for religion in the sense of it carrying some spiritual flame that must not be blown out, some connection to the Divine, whatever that is. And this in spite of my having no religion, no system of beliefs— nothing but Nature-meditation and a sense of universal oneness.
It’s easy for outsiders to think all religions are the same. After being accosted on the street by an invitation to the love of Jesus, I went into the Parish Church, its entrance being a few yards away. It dates back to 1086; was restored to its current state in 1889. Like the market square, which it overlooks, it’s a public space offering continuity through the centuries. Its role is civic as much as spiritual, with a dozen services each year for local and national commemorations. A meet-and-greet volunteer was there, sitting at a table. As my visit had no particular purpose—I’ve gone round often enough gazing at the antiquities—I joined the table, introduced myself as a non-Christian child of the Church of England. We talked of the building’s role in the community, preserving a common heritage, and how you don’t have to be a Christian to feel at home here. At some point I mentioned the Book of Common Prayer by Thomas Cranmer, who suffered public martyrdom by burning at the stake. This was all fine stuff, and the lady knew where I was coming from. But a man at the same table who’d hardly spoken till that point fixed me with a baleful glare and asked permission to “say something”. And then he preached like Jeremiah, on the lines that pretty much everything in the past was terrible and we should not carry forward its iniquity but burn the influence of history in a cleansing fire. I tried to make clear that I wasn’t a congregation, just someone else like him; but he raged as from a pulpit in his anger and his shame—against his own country (South Africa) and Great Britain too. I felt it was time to go, before he went into detail. The traumas he still carried were burning hot, I should stop distracting the meeter-and-greeter, who was there to offer him needed balm. So we exchanged names and shook hands. I offer the vignette as an image of the Church of England today: a “broad church”, inclusive, kind, tolerant, not putting itself forward, not kicking out those who seem to decry its values.
The English in general are known for politeness and a sense of humour. We are pretty good at hypocrisy too. You need all three, perhaps, to calmly watch as our freedoms are threatened from all sides. Nothing new there. How though can one be tolerant of intolerance, and those who don’t believe in freedom as we know it, and reject our notions of a critical approach to beliefs and ideologies? It’s not my role personally to solve the world’s problems, but these questions have been causing me disquiet ever since coming to live in this part of town.
Such thoughts must have nudged me into reading a book by a Somali-Dutch-American refugee/politician/activist/academic, and to put the images of book and author on this post. She’s taken head-on a set of issues which I’ve glimpsed from my doorstep. I feel simultaneously horrified at her content, and relieved at her trenchant stance, her clear and compelling writing; and most of all her courage. These issues are spread world-wide, and are none of my business. Yet I cannot quite say that, for they are on my doorstep, literally. “Love thy neighbour as thyself.” So I shall try and practise lovingkindness, respect, cleanliness, tolerance—of the person, not his intolerance.
I did actually say to myself “England Have My Bones” when I walked under the powerlines, and it wasn’t just inspired by that sweet moment of communing with nature, it was all of the moments, all of the kindness and tolerance I’ve received; a sense of the privilege to be here. For I was born elsewhere, like many whose writing has been infused with love of England and Britishness, such as Rudyard Kipling, George Orwell, T H White (author of The Once and Future King). Those three were all born in India, but educated in England. I’ve had White’s memoir for years, on my Tsundoku pile—see previous post—being impressed greatly by its title, but little else so far. Then, when looking for its origin, I came across another book, Helen Macdonald’s H is for Hawk, and found the following:
In England Have My Bones White wrote one of the saddest sentences I have ever read: ‘Falling in love is a desolating experience, but not when it is with a countryside.’ He could not imagine a human love returned. He had to displace his desires onto the landscape, that great, blank green field that cannot love you back, but cannot hurt you either.And if not for her book, I wouldn’t know about his affinity with my county:
In England have My Bones, he describes Buckinghamshire in a similar way, through what it is not. His county lacks outstanding qualities, beauty and historical significance, and so it avoids the attention of the world. It is safe. When White goes on to explain how Buckinghamshire ‘concealed its individuality in order to preserve it’ but is ‘secretly exuberant in its private way’ you realize that he is writing about his own character. More disguises. The mirror works both ways. The lines between the man and the landscape blur. When White writes of his love for the countryside, at heart he is writing about a hope that he might be able to love himself.
I’m saddened too that White had such a tortured life. For if he had found a human love returned, he could have loved himself, and then he might see that a great blank green field, at least in moments, can love you back.
late blackberries; wild apples; haws with budded ivy; sloes
thistles shining like silver brooches
maybe under this pylon if you like
first attempt
the same scene one evening 9 years later
I watched a team gathering straw bales
getting high from telling the good news on the street
I did the pastel & the photo from under the bigger tree
What’s this old machinery? It’s at the gate to a . . .>>>>
shocking, yet offering a glimmer of hope
title page of an item from my tsundoku pile
>>> . . . farm, & offers water for any thirsty dog
Following in White’s footsteps
15 Comments:
A beautifully written piece. Thank you.
Thanks Bryan. It was so difficult to write I abandoned it twice, but received encouragement & now I do feel it's OK & says more than I believed possible in that many words.
There’s a PS to the above. I said T H White’s book was on my Tsundoku pile, but actually I did read quite a bit of it, probably a lot more. But I never realized it had any connection with Buckinghamshire. He talks about “the Shire”, and none of the place-names in his memoir exist.
Thanks for the post and the images of your world.
Somehow I cannot be satisfied that the love that comes back to me is from the visible world. My intuition tells me that the veil of nature can be looked through. On the other side is the true reality which I long to see face to face. If I can cleanse the windows of my perception than I can know even as I am known.
I’m very grateful for you comment, Ellie, because I’ve been thinking there must be a hundred ways in which people see differently from the way I described them above; any one of which is ripe for discussion between us if anyone wanted to.
You’ve landed on a fundamental one, and described it in such clear terms that I have no difficulty in clarifying my own view and exploring whether or not we are really in different camps.
If I am not mistaken you are speaking of a duality between the visible world and the true reality on the other side. I think the images you’ve chosen have traceable links to the New Testament and Blake.
What I’ve been exploring in the pieces I’ve written over the last few months, and the life-experiences which have inspired them, is how things look from the viewpoint of non-duality. From this viewpoint love is all-pervasive. All earthly love and beauty takes its shine from the One, and when we can tune to it, we find it everywhere. I don’t think non-duality is in fundamental conflict with other paths to seeing true reality face to face.
I wrote a fragment in my journal the other day, for further exploration later: “the good feeling that underlies any good feeling”. I think it ties in with your own phrase “the veil of nature can be looked through”. Some people find love from their pet cat, though objective studies and everyday observation tell us that cats do not have affection for their owners. But there is a fruitful interaction; as indeed there is in a man-made landscape.
At some point we may ask what love actually is. I think it’s what happens spontaneously when the barrier of separateness dissolves, commonality is discovered and primal oneness (which was always there) is restored to our consciousness.
Vincent, a beautiful post on what might be called your 'conscious walking'. But there's just one thing which jars and is in contradiction to the rest and I feel I must point it out in case you haven't looked deeply into the hate-filled propaganda fuelled and encouraged by Ayaan Hirsi Ali. This link clarifies it better than anything I can say:
http://www.salon.com/2015/05/04/ayaan_hirsi_ali_is_dangerous_why_we_must_reject_her_hateful_worldview/
Sorry, I didn't enter the link correctly. It should be all on one line. Best is to coppy/paste it into your browser to get to it. It's from the 04 May 2015 post on Salon.
http://www.salon.com/2015/05/04/ayaan_hirsi_ali_is_dangerous_why_we_must_reject_her_hateful_worldview/
Thanks, Natalie, I am very glad you have brought up this matter, because it is true that she is controversial. I have looked deeply into her ideas. I borrowed Heretic from the library and took two weeks to get through it. It’s very well written but the content is disturbing.
The article you link to doesn’t surprise me. Her book must be a great deal more uncomfortable for her fellow-Muslims. They want nothing more than to shut her up, or failing that to discredit her. I’m also not surprised if Western Liberals think she goes too far. Politicians in England, who don’t want to upset voters in general or make us worse targets for terrorism than we are already, try to distinguish moderate Muslims from “Islamists”. She has her own take on such matters, which doesn’t involve any political or military action, support of secular dictators etc. She is more concerned with the history and dynamics of the religion over the centuries. But she does offer insights into the governance of the various middle-Eastern countries.
Her principal critique of the religion is its failure to reform—i.e. evolve, which she analyzes and contrasts with the development of Christianity & Western democracy. And she also tries to analyze the reasons for a general shift towards a stricter observance of the traditional rules in Islam, based ultimately on the Koran & Hadith.
Living here, I have lacked that background, but simply got to know some of my neighbours and observed others, & been saddened at the extremely shallow level of integration into our society, even after decades of living here.
So my mention of her book and my neighbourhood is a sort of counterpoint to a sense of Englishness and a gratitude which exclaims “England Have My Bones” amongst the fields five miles away. For there, it is possible to feel a harmonious oneness with nature, and a gratitude to the processes of evolution which have brought us to where we are in our beautiful and fortunate country. This contrasts with a system reluctant to integrate with the values of its host society; or to evolve its beliefs and behaviours in any way.
I hope I've clarified the issue a little and suggested that the hate-filled propaganda comes from Ali's detractors.
Vincent, I appreciate your response. But the pronouncements of Ali, self-appointed 'expert' on the Muslim Question, need to be weighed against others who know more about it and see it from a different perspective. A review of her book in TIME magazine (not a usual champion of profound understanding) is worth reading:
http://time.com/3825345/what-ayaan-hirsi-ali-doesnt-get-about-islam/
There's also the fact that her own personal experience of the appalling religious ritual (female genital mutilation) has understandably fuelled the anger that she nurtures. But perhaps the anger makes it impossible for her to be an agent of positive change. She could consult with wiser people both within and outside the Muslim community who also want change and greater understanding but do not fan the flames of fear, suspicion and hatred of 'the Other'.
I should have added that 'the Other', depending on geography, history, culture etc. could be anyone whether Muslim, Jewish, Christian, Hindu, black, brown, yellow, red, member of a different tribe, political party, country, club, gang, family, etc.
You write:
"...the barrier of separateness dissolves, commonality is discovered and primal oneness (which was always there) is restored to our consciousness. "
If that ideal is ever going to become reality on this planet, even in some distant future, then it surely will be by non-divisive means.
Yes, thanks for that link too. I've read the Salon Magazine, article, and now the one in TIME.
Speaking out against slavery and racial inequality was divisive. Who do you blame for that? Why is this different? Where do we see the divisiveness in this world today? These are rhetorical questions, which contain their own answers.
Really I just wanted to say something about Englishness and what in my view fits uneasily with it.
I was not referring to any ideal that might become reality in some distant future. Consciousness, as I mean it, is what goes on in one person, in the moment. Divisions exist and we know what results in some parts of the world. Yet separateness can still dissolve, enemies can embrace in common humanity, respect can reign. And usually does.
As it does in my street, which despite the lack of common language and customs is a real old-fashioned friendly community, with up to four generations of families living in close proximity, outnumbering us English, West Indians, & miscellaneous student lodgers from E. Europe & elsewhere. So we don't go around with badges saying "Je Suis Charlie".
Vincent, this seems to be turning into an argument and maybe that's my fault for criticising someone that you expressed admiration for. This is the tricky bit about commenting, or abstaining from commenting, about a blog post. And it's why I prefer face to face conversation to written exchanges of opinion. Much divisiveness, personal or public, happens because of misunderstanding, misinterpreting or simply not knowing the other person well enough. I apologise if I'm guilty of any of these failings and prefer to end this particular conversation, trusting we'll have other, more fruitful ones.
No fault, Natalie, but you are right, it's time to let it go. I always enjoy duelling with you and don't let it put you off commenting. What's said was useful and please don't ever hold back. But you shall have your choice of weapons, and venue too. Next time face to face. Our seconds shall arrange. Honour must be satisfied.
I have no stake in this either way, but I just want to put my two cents in on something here. I really find articles titles like, "Why We Must Reject...." to be a bit nauseating.
It just has that way about it. Instead of seeming to open a dialogue or engage in honest debate, it has that ring to it, which people so irritating about political correctness in general, of someone saying, "I'm a better, more sensitive, more enlightened person than you, and me and my friends have all gotten together at our cocktail parties and decided what the official right opinion is to have about all of this and now I'm going to beat you over the head mercilessly with it."
Returning to the theme of wandering through meadows . . .
I used to read a blog called Paula's House of Toast, at least for the last six years. She died a few days ago, but her widowed husband is keeping her blog online as a memorial.
I think the last time I made reference to her was on Feb 2nd 2013 in a comment which linked to a post called Prodigal Daughter which starts as follows:
The meadow, of course, like the rest of it all, goes about its business just fine without me. It does not miss my boots or my macro lens or my shadow crossing the dried grass or the clouds of my breath in the cold air. And yet, when I return, it extends a queer hospitality -- one that, like the best sort of love, lets me be. And I, in turn, reciprocate: love, in the form of looking.
You may see in it, as I do, uncanny echoes of the feelings I tried to convey in the post. I wish I could have written like that. This shared feeling newly discovered makes me miss her especially.
Meanwhile, to borrow her own words, the meadow, just like the rest of it all, goes about its business just fine without her.
And later on in her post, she talks about death again:
even at the grave we make our song -- alleluia ! One could hope for such an end: a final explosion of absolute gratitude for the utter mystery of having been let be.
Amen.
Oh, I am so sorry to hear of Paula's death. It was from your blog that I found her House of Toast, which I love. She inspired me to look at what is in front of me more closely and do different things with my very inexpert camera.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home